Start here
The short version: Since April 2022, the U.S. military can no longer automatically discharge, refuse to deploy, or refuse to commission asymptomatic, virally suppressed service members living with HIV. That change came from a federal court in Harrison v. Austin and Roe v. Austin, and the Department of Defense declined to appeal.1 DoD issued Directive-Type Memorandum implementing new HIV service policy in June 2022, and refined it further in later guidance.2
What is still true: an HIV diagnosis at the time you apply to enlist or commission is still a bar to accession under DoDI 6130.03 without a waiver — that piece of the rule was not what Harrison struck down.3 Advocacy on that remaining barrier is ongoing. If you are already serving and you seroconvert, that is a very different legal situation than trying to enlist for the first time.
The Department of Veterans Affairs is the largest single provider of HIV care in the United States, serving roughly 31,000 veterans living with HIV, with dedicated infectious-disease clinicians at most VA medical centers.4
If you were discharged for HIV before April 2022: You may have grounds to request a discharge upgrade or correction of records. Contact Lambda Legal or a veterans service organization for a case review. The Harrison plaintiffs were represented by Lambda Legal and Winston & Strawn.
What changed in 2022 — before and after
Deployment ban
Service members living with HIV were presumptively barred from deployment to CENTCOM (the Middle East/Central Asia area of responsibility), regardless of viral load.
No categorical bar
Asymptomatic, virally suppressed service members cannot be categorically excluded from deployment based on HIV status alone. Individualized medical assessment is required.
Discharge on diagnosis
Service members who seroconverted often faced administrative discharge or non-deployable designation that effectively ended careers.
Retention
Asymptomatic, virally suppressed members must be retained under the same standards as service members with other manageable chronic conditions.
Commissioning bar
Enlisted service members living with HIV (e.g., the Harrison plaintiff, a D.C. National Guard sergeant) were categorically barred from commissioning as officers.
Commissioning open
The categorical bar on commissioning current service members already living with HIV has been eliminated.
If you are currently serving
- Report your diagnosis through your military treatment facility. HIV testing is periodic in service. If you test positive, you will be evaluated at an MTF. Post-Harrison, this is not a career-ender.
- Start (or continue) ART immediately. The clinical and legal frameworks both assume undetectable status. Adherence protects both your health and your service record.
- Know your rights under DoD's updated policy. Familiarize yourself with the current Directive-Type Memorandum on HIV service. If you get pushback (a supervisor telling you you cannot deploy, or a commander pushing an administrative separation), that is grounds for legal consultation.
- Legal help. Lambda Legal, the ACLU, and the National LGBT Bar Association's Military Law Task Force all take cases from service members. Some JAG offices are informed on the post-Harrison landscape; some are not. A civilian advocate helps.
- Confidentiality. Your HIV status is protected medical information under DoD privacy rules. It is not command-wide public information.
If you are trying to enlist or commission
This is the hard part of the current landscape. Under DoD Instruction 6130.03 (medical standards for military appointment, enlistment, or induction), a positive HIV test at time of accession remains a disqualifying condition — not because of Harrison, but because Harrison specifically addressed retention and deployment of people who were already serving. Accession is legally separate.3
What you can do:
- Waiver requests. Some accession disqualifications can be waived on a case-by-case basis. Success is not guaranteed, but virally suppressed applicants have grounds to try. A recruiter and a MEPS medical officer will start this process.
- ROTC and service academies. These fall under accession standards and remain restrictive. Advocacy is ongoing to extend Harrison-style reasoning to accession.
- Civilian federal service. HIV status cannot be a bar to civilian federal employment, including Department of Defense civilian roles. That is a distinct legal regime governed by the Rehabilitation Act.
- Stay in touch with advocacy organizations. Lambda Legal and the Modern Military Association of America are tracking accession-standard cases.
Veterans, discharge review, and VA care
VA is the largest HIV care provider in the U.S.
Roughly 31,000 veterans are in VA care for HIV, treated in specialized infectious-disease clinics that follow DHHS treatment guidelines. VA HIV care is covered for enrolled veterans without ART co-pays for those meeting eligibility rules; VA's Public Health office publishes HIV-specific resources for veterans and clinicians.4
If you were discharged because of HIV before 2022
The Boards for Correction of Military Records can, in some cases, correct records or upgrade discharges when the underlying separation was based on now-invalid policies. Harrison-era discharges are a plausible category for review. This is not automatic — you must apply. Legal help increases success rates.5
PrEP is available to service members and veterans
Both DoD (through military treatment facilities) and VA make PrEP available to HIV-negative service members and veterans who meet clinical eligibility. If you are eligible and interested, ask your primary-care provider or infectious-disease clinic. See PrEP options.6
Timeline — the road to Harrison
1985 HIV testing begins in military
DoD begins mandatory HIV testing of service members. Positive tests initially treated as career-ending.
1991 HIV = discharge policy
Formal policy establishes that HIV-positive service members are non-deployable and often subject to administrative separation.
2013 First treatment updates
DoD begins revising some rules as effective ART becomes standard, but categorical deployment ban remains.
2018 Harrison and Roe cases filed
Lambda Legal files Harrison v. Mattis and Roe v. Shanahan (later renamed Harrison v. Austin and Roe v. Austin) in E.D. Va.
April 6, 2022 District court ruling
Judge Leonie Brinkema grants summary judgment to plaintiffs. DoD deployment and commissioning bars for asymptomatic virally suppressed service members ruled unconstitutional and unlawful under APA.
June 6, 2022 DoJ declines to appeal
Attorney General Merrick Garland certifies that DoJ will not seek further review. Ruling stands.
June 2022 DoD implements
Department of Defense issues Directive-Type Memorandum aligning policy with the ruling.
2023-2026 Implementation and refinement
DoD continues to refine HIV service policy. Accession standards under DoDI 6130.03 remain a subject of ongoing advocacy.
Questions people ask
Does Harrison apply to all branches?
Yes. The ruling addressed Department of Defense-wide policies, which cover Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force. Coast Guard falls under DHS but has aligned. The National Guard and Reserves are also covered when in federal status.
What about undetectable status — is that a requirement?
The Harrison framework applies specifically to asymptomatic service members with undetectable viral loads on ART. That is why immediate ART initiation matters both clinically and legally.
Can a foreign country still bar me because of HIV?
Yes — and this is a separate question from U.S. military policy. Some destination countries have HIV entry restrictions. See HIV & travel for country-by-country details.
Where do I go for legal help?
Lambda Legal (which litigated Harrison), the Modern Military Association of America, the ACLU LGBTQ & HIV Project, and the National LGBT Bar Association's Military Law Task Force all take service-member cases.
Is HIV status shared with my commander?
HIV status is protected medical information. It is not disclosed as a matter of routine to your chain of command. Deployment status and non-deployability designations may become known operationally, but the underlying diagnosis is not automatically shared.
References & Sources
Harrison v. Austin court records, DoJ, DoD policy, VA, Lambda Legal, KFF.
- U.S. Department of Justice. Letter re: Harrison v. Austin and Roe v. Austin — decision not to seek further review. June 6, 2022. justice.gov — official DoJ notification ↵
- Lambda Legal. Harrison v. Austin — case background and DoD compliance. lambdalegal.org — case materials ↵
- Department of Defense Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1, Medical Standards for Military Service: Appointment, Enlistment, or Induction. esd.whs.mil — DoDI accession standards ↵ ↵
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, HIV Program. HIV/AIDS Information for Veterans. hiv.va.gov — VA HIV program ↵ ↵
- Department of Defense, Boards for Correction of Military Records. Application process. boards.law.af.mil — discharge upgrade boards ↵
- CDC. PrEP for HIV Prevention. Guidelines and eligibility. cdc.gov — PrEP guidance ↵
- Modern Military Association of America. HIV & Military Service. modernmilitary.org — MMAA HIV issue page
- KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). The Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program — Veterans and Service Members. kff.org — Ryan White context